I believe it is positively true for those who embrace all Fox chassis automobiles
From a GM man its arduous to beat the fox chassis, 4 cylinder by way of 8 cylinders, na or turbo (the supercoupe wasnt fox proper), handbook or auto, sedan, wagon or coupe, low-cost elements, beauty, mild weight, low-cost, succesful, rwd, and a large aftermarket crammed with cheap high quality elements.
I believe the closest factor GM has is perhaps the G physique, which I really like however given an choice between the two I may need to decide on the fox more often than not.
As a chassis it has two main weaknesses: Rear suspension design and lack of general stiffness. Luckily, the aftermarket has each lined.
I got here >this< shut to purchasing one other one prior to now few weeks earlier than deciding on the S197 I ended up getting. They’re going up in worth, and I wasn’t pleased with what I might discover in my price range with out having to drive 5 states away. Plus, whereas I do not thoughts a undertaking, making a Fox deal with and cease like a contemporary automotive remains to be a significant enterprise that is not low-cost.
Opti mentioned:
(the supercoupe wasnt fox proper)
The Turbo Coupe was a Fox and the Tremendous Coupe was an MN12, an arguably higher chassis.
buzzboy mentioned:
Opti mentioned:
(the supercoupe wasnt fox proper)
The Turbo Coupe was a Fox and the Tremendous Coupe was an MN12, an arguably higher chassis.
A greater design, to make sure, however a lot heavier.
In reply to Tom_Spangler (Discussion board Supporter) :
The MN12 was actually enjoyable when shortened by 8″. These have been constructed down the street from me and I acquired a experience within the T-Fowl again within the day.
Lof8 – Andy mentioned:
that photograph is superb!
Most likely one among my favourite photographs from the archives, tbh.
That mullet lives on in our hearts and minds.
Trending Merchandise
